Onko maa litteä?

Julkaistu 29.8.2017
Since the beginning of the flat earth awakening there have been many attempts to model the motions of the heavens on top of flat projections. It gave us the circular model the square model and other projections like diamond. All have failed so far to make an accurate and verifiable model that shows what is actually going on
up there. It is our research, modeling and experiments that have made it very clear to us that all current models are wrong.
The main reason for that is because they all start with the wrong premise that the tropics form the actual paths of the physical objects like the sun or moon. Most flat earthers also have very little hands on experience in astronomy and proper experiments which led to a immense pile of incorrect assumptions and false claims regarding their model commitment and bias towards their current held beliefs.
That result ended up in a 39.8 mile diameter sun.
That is a very small object compared to the size of the earth.
you will soon find out that mostly azimuth angles will never work with an object that close and small.
On almost all latitudes the sun is directly east of your position.
If you were able to move north or south in seconds from top to bottom,
This led us to do more research into the properties of the sun and its behavior in the sky.
To show in a simple way that the sun for example is NOT a physical object, we have measured the disc size of the sun when it moved directly overhead
If you use that size on any projection on dates like the equinoxes when almost everybody has a sunrise at 90 degrees east
If you take any flat projection and place the small sun on the equator on the equinox and place yourself at sunrise that small object will remain fixed at its azimuth angle on the horizon. Which by rule of geometry makes it impossible to be a small physical object.

We have come across so many false claims and highly questionable ideas about the motion of the sun moon and stars that we find its our duty to correct these claims. Some claim the sun moves in straight lines which is a false claim as shown in the following images
There have also been claims that the sun moves in a circular path which is also incorrect, and it can be verified by tracking the speed of the sun on its azimuth and declination in a 12 hour time span. Although when you go to see the arctic midnight sun it gives the impression of a circular path since any observer has to rotate a full 360 degrees to follow the sun but also with a circular path you end up with the same problems with regards to sun angles on any
given day of the year. The hyperbolic paraboloid shape of the sun analemma is not just a path over a year time span but that same motion is found in the suns 24 hour cycle. The drift pattern is also equal and opposite on both sides of the equator which means that this small.
We started from scratch again.
When you look at crepuscular rays piercing through the clouds over a lake or plane for instance the angles of the rays end up at the actual light source which is just above the clouds in many cases. But we know the sun is not right above the clouds. This drift pattern becomes obvious when you track the sun with high end trackers like Losmandy trackers and just track the azimuth of the sun and do not use the correction adjustments of the tracker so that it runs on its nominal speed of 15 degrees an hour.
39.8 mile diameter sun is moving across the sky at various observed speeds north and south of the equator
After 2 years of research and modeling we were stuck and couldn’t make it work to model the sun or any object accurately.
After looking at photos of crepuscular rays of the sun which all flat earthers have seen a million times we came to a revelation many if not all flat heads have overlooked.
We started wondering what someone would see looking back from the other side and if he or she would see the same thing.
Imagine a scenario where you see these rays over a lake. Those rays are lighting up a spot on the water.
Now put another observer right across the lake looking back at you. Can he see those rays and those lit up spot on the water like in this animation ?
Lets take that 1 step further and give the primary observer seeing the rays a long pole with a mirror attached at the end.
If he were to reflect that ray hitting the water to the observer on the other side would he then see a reflection of the sun in that mirror ?
Keep in mind the distance apart here is only 40 km and where the sun should be for the observer on the other side...
To make these light angles in 3d software you will need, like we used here, a local light source.
But in reality when you move to the other side of the lake and turn around to look back you will have the sun at your back
Now if those rays are personal and cannot be seen by any one else but the observer himself that indicates the sun is a personal or local objective projection and will not see the same thing.